Mental Health in School

Mental Health in School

Identifying the dynamic components of education from the point of view of teachers and administrators

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Educational Management, Kermanshah Azad University
2 PhD student in educational management, department of educational sciences, Kermanshah branch, Kermanshah Azad University
3 Assistant Professor, Educational Management Department, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Kermanshah Azad University
10.22034/jmhs.2024.462486.1069
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify the dynamic components of education from the perspective of teachers and school administrators, focusing on curriculum flexibility, professional development, leadership, and technology integration. Using a descriptive-analytical approach, data were collected through a comprehensive literature review and qualitative interviews with educators. The findings emphasize the vital role of curriculum flexibility in adapting teaching methods and content to meet the diverse needs of students. Continuous professional development was presented as a necessity to improve the skills and knowledge of teachers, enabling them to effectively implement innovative educational strategies and technologies. Leadership, particularly by school principals, was recognized as central to fostering a supportive and innovative school culture. In addition, technology integration improves the learning and teaching processes by making them more interactive and accessible. The results of this study are consistent with the existing literature and emphasize the importance of adaptability and innovation in education. However, this study provides a more comprehensive perspective by combining the perspectives of teachers and principals. Recommendations for future research include examining these components in different educational contexts and developing strategies for effective implementation. This study provides valuable insights for educators, policy makers, and researchers who aim to improve educational outcomes through dynamic and responsive learning environments.
Keywords

Subjects


Arrieta, G. S. (2021). Curriculum Evaluation: Inputs for Principal’s Instructional Leadership.
Burdine, J. T., Thorne, S., & Sandhu, G. (2020). Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research. Medical Education, 55, 341-348.
Calderón, A., Scanlon, D., MacPhail, A., & Moody, B. (2020). An integrated blended learning approach for physical education teacher education programmes: teacher educators’ and pre-service teachers’ experiences. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26, 562-577.
Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25, 443-455.
García-Chamorro, M., & Rosado-Mendinueta, N. (2021). Embracing Conceptualizations of English Language Teacher Education From a Complexity Perspective. Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.
Gleason, N. (2020). Conclusion: Strategic Leadership for Diversity and Inclusion in Higher Education. In Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education.
González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability.
Güngör, B. A., Metin, M., & Saraçoğlu, S. (2022). A Content Analysis Study towards Researches Regarding Context-Based Learning Approach in Science Education by Between Years 2010 and 2020 in Turkey. Journal of Science Learning.
Haddad, S. (2020). Educational Management vis-à-vis Educational Leadership. In Innovations in Educational Leadership and Continuous Teachers' Professional Development.
Indahl, T. C., Ekker, M. P., Sindberg, G., & Pierret, C. (2021). “Science for All”: A Case Study of Digitizing Inquiry-Driven Professional Development. Creative Education, 12, 1773-1782.
Kondakçı, Y. (2020). Educational Change. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
Koopmans, M. (2020). Education is a Complex Dynamical System: Challenges for Research. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88, 358-374.
Lakomski, G., & Evers, C. (2020). Theories of Educational Leadership. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
Litz, D. R. (2021). Transformational Teacher Leadership.
Martins, C., Mesquita, C., Santos, G., & Patrício, M. R. (2022). Leaders' Voices on Curriculum and Curricular Flexibility. EDULEARN Proceedings.
Nguyen Ph.H., & Yen, D. (2022). Teachers' Adaptability to General Curriculum Reform. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research.
Reinholz, D., White, I., & Andrews, T. (2021). Change theory in STEM higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8.
Santos, M. A. B. (2023). Effects of Flexible Learning Training on Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Technology Integration: Basis for Strategic Flexible Learning Action Plan. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal.
Stunder, S., & Lonergan, L. (2022). Integrating Leadership and Change: Molding Personal Leadership Style In Education. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Advances in Research in Education.
Supartini, R., & Agustin, M. (2021). Principal’s Academic Supervision to Improve Non-Formal Early Childhood Education Teacher’s Competence. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Early Childhood Education (ICECE 2020).
Tariq, B., Dilawar, M., & Muhammad, Y. (2020). Innovative Teaching and Technology Integration: Exploring Elderly Teachers’ Attitudes. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 5, 1-16.
Tomé, J. M. (2023). Educational Process as Something Dynamic. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal.
Wessling, K., & Velden, R. (2021). Flexibility in educational systems - Concept, indicators, and directions for future research.